Member-only story

The Struggle Inside the White House To Redefine American Power

Darren Blair

·3.1k Followers· Follow

Published in The Obamians: The Struggle Inside The White House To Redefine American Power

4 min read

319 View Claps

52 Respond

Save

Listen

The Obamians: The Struggle Inside the White House to Redefine American Power

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1699 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	412 pages

The White House, Home To The President Of The United States. The Obamians: The Struggle Inside The White House To Redefine American Power

The Biden administration is facing a major challenge in redefining American power. After four years of Donald Trump's "America First" agenda, the new administration is seeking to restore American leadership on the global stage. But there are competing visions within the administration about how to approach China, Russia, and other global challenges. Some officials argue for a more assertive approach, while others favor a more diplomatic one. The administration is also grappling with how to balance its commitment to human rights with its need to cooperate with authoritarian regimes.

Competing Visions for American Power

The Biden administration is home to a range of views on how to redefine American power. Some officials, such as Secretary of State Antony Blinken, argue for a more assertive approach to foreign policy. They believe that the United States must be willing to use its military and economic power to defend its interests and promote its values. Others, such as National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, favor a more diplomatic approach. They argue that the United States can achieve its goals through cooperation and engagement with other countries.

These competing visions are reflected in the administration's approach to China. Some officials, such as Blinken, have taken a tough line on China, criticizing its human rights record and its aggressive behavior in the South China Sea. Others, such as Sullivan, have emphasized the need for cooperation with China on issues such as climate change and nuclear nonproliferation.

The administration is also grappling with how to balance its commitment to human rights with its need to cooperate with authoritarian regimes. This issue is particularly acute in the Middle East, where the United States has long relied on partnerships with authoritarian regimes to maintain stability. The Biden administration has pledged to put human rights at the center of its foreign policy, but it remains to be seen how this will be implemented in practice.

The Implications for American Foreign Policy

The internal debates within the White House are likely to have a significant impact on American foreign policy. If the administration adopts a more assertive approach, it could lead to increased tensions with China and Russia. It could also make it more difficult for the United States to cooperate with authoritarian regimes on issues such as climate change and nuclear nonproliferation.

Conversely, if the administration adopts a more diplomatic approach, it could lead to a more stable relationship with China and Russia. It could also make it easier for the United States to cooperate with authoritarian regimes on issues of mutual interest.

Ultimately, the Biden administration's approach to American power will be shaped by a variety of factors, including the evolving global landscape, the domestic political climate, and the administration's own priorities. However, the internal debates within the White House suggest that the administration is still struggling to define its vision for American power in the 21st century.

The Obamians: The Struggle Inside the White House to Redefine American Power

4.3 out of 5